-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Deployment of SPF began in early 2004. It was designed to check the MAIL
FROM (2821-From) Return-Path in SMTP, not any 2822-header fields like
PRA.
Inspired by Stuart's article here: The _titles_ of Meng's and Mark's
drafts alone show this.
[...]
Don't you think this becomes clear from my IESG appeal (which I'm going to
include in the IAB appeal)? Somehow I doubt this is worth mentioning more
explicitly.
MARID decided that using existing v=spf1 policies for PRA cannot work,
evidence Meng's v=marid article.
This is stated in the IESG appeal, but I am reiterating it for emphasis in
the IAB appeal draft. Meng's article is referenced by the IESG appeal.
For a substantial portion of mail (some say 80%, pointer to one of
Hector's article stating this) MAIL FROM and PRA are different, as
explained in (pointer to old appeal).
I'm not sure this can be considered even half representative. What article
was that again (URL)?
More than a million v=spf1 policies have been published under this
assumption since early 2004.
I think we can only legitimately use the number of records as a basis for
our argument that were published before late 2004. This is what I did in
the IESG appeal.
Most of the other items of yours are included. Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6iBgwL7PKlBZWjsRAlxtAJ9P01EoWe3IiqiVlEti7KLDo23EMQCg+odZ
EvpkUx5HZu9LSyjiTgGDz/4=
=D5Ws
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com