John Kelly wrote:
"Rejected due to %s policy for sender %s",
- (sid_result == SM_MARID_FAIL ? "Sender-ID" : "SPF"),
+ (sid_result == SM_MARID_FAIL ? "SPF" : "SPF"),
badaddr);
Beautification of C was one of my paid "hobbies" for some time,
here I'd take either...
(spf_result == SM_MARID_FAIL ? "SPF" : "Sender-ID"),
...just in case if somebody wants to patch it another direction
later, or I'd get rid of the "either SPF or SPF":
"Rejected due to SPF policy for sender %s",
badaddr);
Sorry, C and ABNF trigger my "hardcore nitpicking mode"... :-)
One reason why I never looked into any SPF implementation. Bye
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com