Just to amplify, Sender ID is a proprietary attempt to mandate behavior
that no internet RFC requires.
I don't think you'll find many (if any) on this list that care to redesign
mailing lists to support Microsoft's patented attempt to block free
software. Just for comparison's sake, look at the licensing terms Yahoo is
using for DKIM.
Scott K
...... Original Message .......
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25 -0500 Scott Kitterman <spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com>
wrote:
This list has nothing to with Sender ID. If there is a problem it with
sender ID.
Scott K
...... Original Message .......
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:44:04 -0500 John Kelly <jak(_at_)isp2dial(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:22:03 +0100, Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
nobody @ xyzzy ?
Last night I tested sendmail sid-filter and it rejected that mail from
the list as a sender-id failure.
If the SPF mailing list is willing accept to junk like that, I wonder
why they don't add their own headers to provide sender-id compliance.
Funny that.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com