On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25 -0500, Scott Kitterman <spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com>
wrote:
This list has nothing to with Sender ID.
Thanks for the clue.
If there is a problem it with sender ID.
They could say the same thing about SPF.
Just to amplify, Sender ID is a proprietary attempt to mandate behavior
that no internet RFC requires.
Their experimental sender-id RFC is no more (or less) experimental
than your experimental SPF RFC.
I don't think you'll find many (if any) on this list that care to redesign
mailing lists to support Microsoft's patented attempt to block free
software.
Ooooh. Sounds like I should be real scared of Microsoft.
But I read what sendmail said about Microsoft's license and patents,
and they're not worried about it, so why should I be?
Just for comparison's sake, look at the licensing terms Yahoo is
using for DKIM.
I'm implementing all three: SPF, sender-ID, and domain keys too.
It's high time to start shredding bogus mail, and get it off the
Internet. There's too much mail anyway. Who can read all this
garbage?
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com