-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Kelly wrote:
Mark Shewmaker wrote:
However, you are free (other than possible patent concerns) to continue
using your chosen method of rejecting mail if you wish. Just don't
expect anyone to alter their published records in such a way as to make
your misinterpretation result in answers more in line with what you
want.
If senders want to get their mail thru, they will comply. They need
me more than I need them.
I doubt that either Frank Ellerman (whose mailing list post was rejected)
or listbox.com (who redistributed Frank's message to you) find it being of
much importance to get Frank's message delivered to you specifically.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD/27wwL7PKlBZWjsRAj4vAJ9z5qdPVKcAuwzRlLcENoCZP6wiggCfe/dr
L8Ve8gB9C+N4vurvnDRpr4U=
=Ha1w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com