It sounds like the Sender-ID re-use of v=spf1 records is going to be a
huge problem, possibly causing both of the experimental RFCs to
collide and fail where either might have succeeded on its own.
Do Sender-ID implementations use trusted-forwarder.org? If so, would
it be possible for trusted-forwarder.org to mitigate the problem by
publishing a record like:
spf.trusted-forwarder.org. IN TXT "spf2.0/pra ?all"
David
--
This message was sent from a non-repliable address for a closed mailing list.
If you wish to reply directly to me, you can use the following address, which
expires on 08 Mar 2006:
<mazieres-8c2yrrrd8xc6rrc6hnxfjwzs6a(_at_)temporary-address(_dot_)scs(_dot_)stanford(_dot_)edu>
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com