David Mazieres (no direct replies) wrote:
I almost wonder if it is worth extending the SPF draft to accept a new
version string (v=spf3?) as well as v=spf1, so at least there is some
way of declaring a sites exclusive participation in the SPF
experiment.
v=spf1 ip4:10.0.0.0/8 -all comment:oh-and-btw-sender-id-sucks
;)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com