spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL

2006-02-27 12:54:07
Stuart D. Gathman writes:

    (reason: 550 5.7.1 <mark(_at_)primefactor(_dot_)com>... recipient denied, 
because MX 5
'mail.bmsi.com.' [24.248.44.156] 
(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)=stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> did not accept the empty
address, <>, as required by RFC 821, 1123, 2505, and 2821)

Once I figure out a workaround, I'll notify him by private email...

The workaround I use is to defer false-bounce checks until after the
DATA command (but before the data itself), using sendmail's
check_data.  At that point, $u isn't set, so you have to set your own
macro earlier.  I set mine in Local_check_rcpt.  Bounces and CBVs
involve only one recipient, making this easy.

--
Dick St.Peters, stpeters(_at_)NetHeaven(_dot_)com 

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>