spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV

2006-02-16 12:41:48
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Craig Whitmore wrote:

MAIL FROM: <>
RCPT TO: user(_at_)yourdomain(_dot_)com
QUIT
callback works (as its a call back and it had no data)

and
MAIL FROM: <>
RCPT TO: user(_at_)yourdomain(_dot_)com
DATA
.
(give reject as the rcpt is from <> AND its sent directly to a username AND 
there is data_

This would fix calls backs (the only problem I see at the moment with 
BATV ). What do people think?

Yes, this is standard practice.  The drawback is that you have to
accept and discard all the garbage before issuing the reject.  Sure
wish SMTP would allow issuing a reject during data - say right
after the headers.  This would be a boon to 2822 based authentication
schemes.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com