----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV
Craig Whitmore wrote:
BATV ). What do people think?
I guess that BATV can't break CBV, otherwise BATV wouldn't
work for "real" auto-replies not limited to bounce messages.
CBV is SMTP without DATA and MAIL FROM:<>, or isn't it ? Bye
CBV is
"
MAIL FROM: <>
RCPT TO: isthis(_dot_)emailaddres(_at_)real
QUIT
"
If you reject the RCPT TO: when the MAIL FROM is <> with BATV
then CBV would break so IMHO you have to wait until they try and
do a DATA then you know its not a CBV and then reject it. You
wouldn't reject if the RCPT TO: is a valid BATV encoded BATV message.
Thanks
Craig
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com