John Kelly wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:22:03 +0100, Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
nobody @ xyzzy ?
Last night I tested sendmail sid-filter and it rejected that mail from
the list as a sender-id failure.
If the SPF mailing list is willing accept to junk like that, I wonder
why they don't add their own headers to provide sender-id compliance.
Funny that.
Sorry for premature send earlier.
The envelope-sender is
listbox+trampoline+(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_)(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
v2.listbox.com's SPF record is:
v=spf1 redirect=listbox.com
listbox.com's SPF record is:
v=spf1 mx a:dream.listbox.com a:emerald.pobox.com mx:fallback-relay.pobox.com
ptr redirect=%{l1r+}._at_.%{o2}._spf.pobox.com
Since the sending host for this mailing list (208.210.124.79) matches the "mx"
bit of listbox.com, the list mail is SPF compliant.
What part of Sender ID breaks this?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com