spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2006-02-08 19:13:10
On 08/02/06, Julian Mehnle <julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> wrote:
To the Internet Architecture Board,

as per the Internet Standards Process, section 6.5, and on behalf of the
SPF project, I am hereby appealing the IESG's decision[2] on 2005-12-08 to
publish the draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 I-D[3] as an Experimental RFC
as-is.

Good work, Julian! Now you can finally get a little bit of sleep. :-)

As one looks more into it, isn't it just so pathetic of how much
damage might be done by only four characters of a specification and
how much effort one must put in order to get rid of these four
characters?

But hey, no-one said life is easy. :-)

Constantine.


--
В. В. Путин о совершенстве, 24 декабря 2000 года: Если человека все
устраивает, то он полный идиот. Здорового человека в нормальной памяти
не может всегда и всё устраивать.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com