Well, everyone knows that how IETF does as with individual vs corporation
influences is no longer how its been and that is just too bad...
But anyway, the comment is correct and the statement
"Sender ID authors and Microsoft" should be replaced with just
"Sender ID authors".
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, David Sowder wrote:
From my very limited understanding of how the IETF works with individuals
rather than corporations, perhaps the paragraph beginning "On a technical
level," should say the name of the draft author of
draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 rather than Microsoft as the draft's submitter.
On 2/8/06, Julian Mehnle <julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
here's a carefully considered draft for the IAB appeal. Sorry for the
delay! Please review it soon!
Julian.
--
David R. Sowder
University of Texas at Arlington
Department of Modern Languages
Language Acquisition Center Supervisor
Work: davids(_at_)uta(_dot_)edu
Personal: david(_at_)sowder(_dot_)com
Lists: davidrsowder(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
http://david.sowder.com/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com