More modifier madness:
x1.test "v=spf1 modix=1 -include:x2.test redirect=x3.test exp=_x1.test"
x2.test "v=spf1 modix=2 +ip4:0.0.0.0/1 -all exp=_x2.test"
x3.test "v=spf1 modix=3 +ip4:128.0.0.0/2 -all exp=_x3.test"
_x1.test "you lose"
_x2.test "ignored"
_x3.test "oops"
That's perfectly legal, result FAIL comes either with "oops"
if it matched the -all in the redirect=x3.test, or it comes
with "you lose" if it matched the -include:x2.test.
No FAIL with explanation "ignored" for x1.test. That could
be two interesting cases for an SPF test suite. But exp= is
only the _simple_ case where the spec. explains all details:
With modix=1 / modix=2 / modix=3 I'm not sure, do they work
like "exp" ? I.e. modix=1 for "you lose", modix=3 for "oops",
and modix=2 for "ignored" is impossible for x1.test ?
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com