-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthew(_dot_)van(_dot_)Eerde(_at_)hbinc(_dot_)com wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
... draft-schlitt-spf-classic having entered AUTH48 status?
...
http://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/rfc-editor-process.gif
According to my reading of that picture, the "Assign RFC #" step is
before AUTH48. Do we have a number?
I have no idea, but in any case we're in AUTH48 if the RFC Editor's queue
[1] can be trusted. If Wayne and Meng have been sent the final edition of
the draft (as reviewed by the RFC Editor), it would be my guess that it
already includes the RFC number.
References:
1. http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html#draft-schlitt-spf-classic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEB4wywL7PKlBZWjsRApIBAKCfyDmCCt6FQcIMObppR9dEmGo4mwCgh+TV
Gv62YnHFrIjEE1sWCiF6B7c=
=ucCC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
