SPF Discuss (date)
March 31, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, John A. Martin, 12:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Julian Mehnle, 09:59
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Matthew.van.Eerde, 09:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Matthew.van.Eerde, 09:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Julian Mehnle, 08:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Frank Ellermann, 01:33
March 29, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Please don't try posting to spf-council unless you mean it, Julian Mehnle, 14:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Julian Mehnle, 14:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question about redirect syntax, Julian Mehnle, 14:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: spf-council IRC logs for 2006-03-27, Julian Mehnle, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> -- AUTH48 changes, Julian Mehnle, 08:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Any chance of getting Mondays IRC log?, Julian Mehnle, 06:54
March 28, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Any chance of getting Mondays IRC log?, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 18:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review -- Final list of changes for review, Julian Mehnle, 17:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Did I miss something?, Roberto Alsina, 16:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: Did I miss something?, Julian Mehnle, 16:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Did I miss something?, Roberto Alsina, 15:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 12:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, John A. Martin, 12:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Did I miss something?, Julian Mehnle, 11:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 11:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 10:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF vs. CSV (once again), Hector Santos, 07:26
- [spf-discuss] SPF vs. CSV (once again), Julian Mehnle, 05:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation forpostfix yet?, Hector Santos, 05:18
March 27, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 21:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 20:32
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Nick Nicholas, 19:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Tom Lahti, 19:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Robin Harrison, 18:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 17:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Nicol, 16:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 16:00
- [spf-discuss] Did I miss something?, Roberto Alsina, 15:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Julian Mehnle, 14:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] request from the spf ticket system, Koen Martens, 13:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, David Woodhouse, 12:10
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 11:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 11:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Nick Nicholas, 10:38
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 10:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Kurt Andersen, 10:11
- [spf-discuss] SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?, Mark Jeftovic, 09:19
- [spf-discuss] Re: Why SRS really sucks, Julian Mehnle, 09:10
March 25, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, geoffj, 22:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 16:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, John A. Martin, 13:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, geoffj, 09:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 08:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 08:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 07:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, william(at)elan.net, 05:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Julian Mehnle, 02:16
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 01:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 01:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Frank Ellermann, 00:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Frank Ellermann, 00:12
March 23, 2006
- RE: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 18:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 17:36
- [spf-discuss] Email Authentication Summit, Dotzero, 11:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Kurt Andersen, 10:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] request from the spf ticket system, Julian Mehnle, 09:24
- [spf-discuss] request from the spf ticket system, Koen Martens, 06:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Julian Mehnle, 05:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", william(at)elan.net, 03:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 02:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question about redirect syntax, Frank Ellermann, 01:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Frank Ellermann, 01:18
March 20, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re[2]: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Kurt Andersen, 13:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", william(at)elan.net, 13:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Dick St.Peters, 13:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Jeff Macdonald, 12:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Stuart D. Gathman, 12:04
- [spf-discuss] Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec", Kurt Andersen, 11:45
March 15, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question about redirect syntax, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:42
- [spf-discuss] SPF RR not totally useless for v=spf1, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Question about redirect syntax, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Question about redirect syntax, Kurt Andersen, 16:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question about redirect syntax, Julian Mehnle, 15:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question about redirect syntax, Scott Kitterman, 15:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Question about redirect syntax, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:31
- [spf-discuss] Question about redirect syntax, Kurt Andersen, 10:41
March 13, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Constantine A. Murenin, 13:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Casey Allen Shobe, 07:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change - FAQ is ready to go too, Frank Ellermann, 00:14
March 12, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 23:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Frank Ellermann, 22:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fwd: AUTH48 [EN]: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE, Frank Ellermann, 21:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: AUTH48 [EN]: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE, geoffj, 16:36
- [spf-discuss] Conducting the IETF experiment (was: SPF-council IRC logs for 2006-03-11), Julian Mehnle, 14:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF-council IRC logs for 2006-03-11, Scott Kitterman, 12:16
March 11, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 20:01
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: AUTH48 [EN]: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE, Julian Mehnle, 19:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Julian Mehnle, 19:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 14:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 12:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:05
- [spf-discuss] Re: Need Help with SPF DNS record, Scott Kitterman, 11:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Need Help with SPF DNS record, Mark Shewmaker, 11:35
- [spf-discuss] Evolutionary site change - FAQ is ready to go too, Scott Kitterman, 11:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Need Help with SPF DNS record, Scott Kitterman, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Need Help with SPF DNS record, Kaas Baichtal, 09:38
- [spf-discuss] Need Help with SPF DNS record, Rob Robson, 09:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Scott Kitterman, 08:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 06:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 05:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 05:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 04:59
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 02:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, william(at)elan.net, 00:35
March 10, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Frank Ellermann, 23:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 21:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-webmasters] Re: Evolutionary site change, Scott Kitterman, 21:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 21:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: Evolutionary site change, Frank Ellermann, 21:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman, 21:21
- Re: Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Scott Kitterman, 21:18
- Re: Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:10
- Evolutionary site change - was (Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers), Scott Kitterman, 20:31
- [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle, 20:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: The next meeting: Sat 2006-03-11 14:00..16:00 UTC, Frank Ellermann, 18:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 17:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] other modifiers, Julian Mehnle, 12:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] other modifiers, Julian Mehnle, 12:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Scott Kitterman, 10:42
March 08, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: PGP was: (IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle), John A. Martin, 16:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 15:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Jeroen Massar, 12:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 10:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Scott Kitterman, 10:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] PGP, Julian Mehnle, 10:12
- [spf-discuss] PGP was: (IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle), Scott Kitterman, 08:20
March 07, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Constantine A. Murenin, 19:34
- RE: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Seth Goodman, 17:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Julian Mehnle, 16:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Daniel Taylor, 12:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: The "Cheeseplate" HSARPA proposal has been published, Julian Mehnle, 06:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] The "Cheeseplate" HSARPA proposal has been published, Dick St.Peters, 05:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] The "Cheeseplate" HSARPA proposal has been published, Julian Mehnle, 05:44
March 06, 2006
- [spf-discuss] The "Cheeseplate" HSARPA proposal has been published, Julian Mehnle, 16:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Scott Kitterman, 14:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: setting up your own email server, John Kelly, 13:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Hannah Schroeter, 11:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Frank Ellermann, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: setting up your own email server, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:18
March 03, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Constantine A. Murenin, 17:24
- RE: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Matthew.van.Eerde, 15:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Constantine A. Murenin, 13:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Kaas Baichtal, 13:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, pay_now(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com, 13:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 12:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Scott Kitterman, 11:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Kaas Baichtal, 11:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, pay_now(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com, 10:52
- RE: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Bruce Barnes, 09:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, Scott Kitterman, 09:03
- [spf-discuss] Godaddy Policy, pay_now(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com, 08:50
March 02, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal denied, draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 17:22
- RE: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal denied, draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Matthew.van.Eerde, 17:03
- [spf-discuss] IAB appeal denied, draft-schlitt-spf-classic AUTH48 review, Julian Mehnle, 16:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, John Kelly, 15:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, Dick St.Peters, 13:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, Arjen de Korte, 13:17
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, Matthew.van.Eerde, 13:12
- [spf-discuss] SPF: '-exists' vs. '~all' for national email service providers, Constantine A. Murenin, 11:37
- Re: IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Julian Mehnle, 11:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Keith Moore, 10:30
- RE: [spf-discuss] Setting up SPF on Yahoo, Erwin Kodiat, 09:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Constantine A. Murenin, 05:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Scott Kitterman, 05:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 05:21
- IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle, Leslie Daigle, 03:44
March 01, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Frank Ellermann, 20:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Scott Kitterman, 20:21
- [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Frank Ellermann, 19:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48, Frank Ellermann, 18:49
- RE: Verizon (was Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT), Seth Goodman, 17:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Julian Mehnle, 13:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Jeff Macdonald, 10:55
- Re: Verizon (was Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT), Stuart D. Gathman, 08:54
- Verizon (was Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT), Dick St.Peters, 07:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Julian Mehnle, 07:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Backscatter auto-complaints, Julian Mehnle, 07:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Julian Mehnle, 07:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, paddy, 05:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 05:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Constantine A. Murenin, 05:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48, Scott Kitterman, 04:36