spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re[2]: Inconsistency in SPF spec re. "domain-spec"

2006-03-20 13:55:47
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 2006-03-20 11:56, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:44:38AM -0800, Kurt Andersen wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

After pondering the issue with the "domain-spec" of SPF not
matching RFC 1034's definition, I have found another, perhaps
more serious inconsistency.  (See the earlier thread on
spf-discuss found at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20772 for
details.)

Section 6.l provides an example of redirect with an illegal
(according to the LDH rule) record.  This is not just an academic
issue, as the current records for Microsoft and even POBox
themselves violate the LDH specification (by using underscores
'_'). I have not combed the spec for further examples, but I
suspect that they are there too.

I strongly urge the council and the authors to correct this
inconsistency by expanding the definition of "domain-spec" in the
SPF draft to match RFC 1034 before this problem becomes
formalized.

http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/apa/names.html

RFC 1034  Updated by 1101, 1183, 1348, 1876, 1982, 2065, 2181,
2308, 2535, 4033, 4034, 4035, 4343, 4035
None of which affect my claim of inconsistency between the DNS name
specifications and the SPF spec.

- --Kurt

- --
Kurt Andersen <kurta(_at_)agilent(_dot_)com>
Agilent Technologies Postmaster
Global Messaging Team, Agilent Technologies
+1 (509) 921-3792
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFEHxaV8aJC5m0EgMURAr5kAJ47E48PWToSIoCv9kYXVu5hhGTfxgCeLytX
tUBsObdDLKkhY01Z9XH3h6U=
=VaDu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com