On 01/03/06, Constantine A. Murenin <mureninc(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 6:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman
<spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:12:07 +0100 Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/rfc/hist.cgi?draft=draft-schlitt-spf-classic
draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060214 entered status AUTH48
draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060214 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20060207 (7
days)
draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060228 current status AUTH48 since 20060214
(14 days)
I guess that answers the question about will the IAB appeal delay things.
Did the SID drafts change state too?
http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/rfc/hist.cgi?draft=draft-lyon-senderid-pra
draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060214 entered status AUTH48
draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060214 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20060207 (7 days)
draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060228 current status AUTH48 since 20060214 (14
days)
Oops, they have several documents, here is the main one:
http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/rfc/hist.cgi?draft=draft-lyon-senderid-core
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060214 entered status AUTH48
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060214 entered status REF-INT
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060214 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20060207 (7 days)
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060228 current status AUTH48 since 20060214 (14 days)
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060228 current status REF-INT since
20060214 (14 days)
Constantine.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com