spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: AUTH48

2006-03-01 20:21:46
On 03/01/2006 21:06, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
draft-lyon-senderid-core 20060228 current status REF-INT since 20060214
(14 days)

REF-INT means "depending on a normative REFerence, which is
already available in the INTernal RfC editor queue" (= SPF).

SID-core can't get its RfC number before SPF.  Unlike PRA,
PRA has only an informative reference to SID-core, it could
be used independently elsewhere.

There's no such thing like the IESG flag (for IESG appeals)
in the case of IAB appeals, the latter is just too special.

Should somebody inform the RfC editor about this oddity ?


Well, I think of you as our IETF process expert....  You tell us?

I'd say you should tell them.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com