spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] AUTH48

2006-03-01 05:21:58
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 6:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman <spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:12:07 +0100 Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> wrote:
http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/rfc/hist.cgi?draft=draft-schlitt-spf-classic

draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060214 entered status AUTH48
draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060214 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20060207 (7
days)
draft-schlitt-spf-classic 20060228 current status AUTH48 since 20060214
(14 days)

I guess that answers the question about will the IAB appeal delay things.

Did the SID drafts change state too?

http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/rfc/hist.cgi?draft=draft-lyon-senderid-pra

draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060214 entered status AUTH48
draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060214 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20060207 (7 days)
draft-lyon-senderid-pra 20060228 current status AUTH48 since 20060214 (14 days)

Constantine.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com