On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 11:18 -0500, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
I've always thought that the lack of viable SRS functionality has been a
major factor impeding the adaptation of SPF. Without it, SPF is just a
half-solution.
That's true -- SPF without SRS isn't a proper solution to anything.
But stop and think about what happens when/if SRS _is_ ubiquitous -- all
hosts rewrite the reverse-path to include a domain or hostname of their
own when they send a mail on, so SPF has become fairly much equivalent
to CSV.
So you've introduced all this breakage for no real benefit. You might as
well have adopted CSV instead of SPF in the first place.
--
dwmw2
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com