-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Taylor wrote:
I'm still waiting for someone, anyone, to come up with an e-mail
source forgery prevention mechanism superior to SPF. I would say PGP/GPG
is the perfect solution, but look at your inbox and mail client and tell
me it is more widespread than SPF despite having been available for
over 10 years now and solving more problems than SPF attempts to.
And I'm still waiting for the day when Listbox stops mutilating message
parts so I can stop using inline PGP and start using PGP/MIME... *sigh*
Anyway, there are far fewer domain owners than end-users, so that should
explain SPF's structural advantage over PGP. But I agree that PGP is the
definite solution to the forgery problem. Banks, eBay, etc. should really
form a cooperative initiative and start propagating PGP to their users
instead of inventing silly workarounds like "never click links in e-mails
claiming to come from us".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEDheWwL7PKlBZWjsRAi4mAJsF+tBoMHBJ50XxYZNi6yLpmindSwCg3/4u
CdwLsH2/KoUo6T9i7CKkSfk=
=DG1U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com