-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Massar wrote:
There is actually already a provision for automatically and distributed
checking of signatures. You should kick Werner Koch (cc'd) about this as
he knows the full details of this can be setup.
See the following one for a lot more details on this:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-August/026388.html
This looks very interesting. I wonder why they haven't approached the SPF
project, as SPF seems to be made to exactly fit this task. Perhaps now
one of _us_ should contact them and tell them about our ideas for PGP/
S/MIME support in a potential successor or extension to SPFv1.
I'll try to get my proposal on another SPF version out ASAP, perhaps then
someone else can contact Werner Koch & friends based on that. I would do
it, but I'd rather restrict myself to coordination work and the website
currently. We could certainly use volunteers for stuff like interacting
with the PGP, DKIM, or "Authentication-Results:" header people!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFED1hvwL7PKlBZWjsRAmaqAKCheY6nkjB+QrFbv3oDjkI3DPuGzwCgj6T2
L/vG9Q//8pv37FIVxmvs/o4=
=WTmv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com