On 03/06/2006 11:51, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think I missed something....
What was Keith's proposal?
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20672>
| p.s. I am personally of the opinion that SPF in all but a few corner
| cases is harmful to the interoperability of Internet mail, so I'm very
| keen to have those limitations documented.
He wrote that in other words already last year, the idea is to
document why PRA is broken (and above all breaks v=spf1) in an
Internet draft. E.g. merging some texts in my link collection
<http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/senderid-appeal.htm#SPF>
OK. I didn't read that e-mail as thinking PRA was broken. I read it as he
thinks SPF period is harmful (he's not alone in that opinion).
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com