spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?

2006-03-11 12:13:49
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:04:47 -0500 (EST) "Stuart D. Gathman" 
<stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:

As for SES and BATV, I don't think they can be considered to be sender 
auth 
methods.  They're really receiver-side-only local mechanisms.  CSV 
however 
is a candidate for support in SPFv2.1 IMO.

For old SES used oly to block bounce spam, correct.  However, the new SES 
that
provides an authentication server is certainly a sender auth method. 

Both new/old SES or BATV could be use in conjunction with exists: as one 
way to deal with the SPF forwarding 'problem'.  So there is potential for a 
direct tie to SPF.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>