Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:

> As for SES and BATV, I don't think they can be considered to be sender auth 
> methods.  They're really receiver-side-only local mechanisms.  CSV however 
> is a candidate for support in SPFv2.1 IMO.
For old SES used oly to block bounce spam, correct.  However, the new SES that
provides an authentication server is certainly a sender auth method. 

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com