[spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?
2006-03-10 23:07:41
Julian Mehnle wrote:
[lots of stuff] Sigh, somehow I managed to type a reply for
about two hours, and then accidentally deleted it... :-(
The excutive summary, many good ideas. But my focus is SMTP,
no separate HELO scope, and an IETF PS for that part. The "!"
qualifier idea is interesting, and certainly better than a new
"pop=" for a _positional_ op=. Adding "pop=" to the op-draft
would be trivial, but who needs it for what practical purpose ?
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, (continued)
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Julian Mehnle
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman
[spf-discuss] Re: SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?,
Frank Ellermann <=
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, william(at)elan.net
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Scott Kitterman |
Next by Date: |
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, william(at)elan.net |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, Stuart D. Gathman |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [spf-discuss] SPFv2.1: whether, why, and what?, william(at)elan.net |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|