-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Hi Meng,
sorry for the delay. As I wrote earlier, William requested that the
list of AUTH48 changes be explicitly cleared by the council, which we
did in two meetings on Monday and Tuesday.
I am attaching a plain text file with the changes in the RFC Editor's
preferred format. Please forward it to the RFC Editor and let us know
what he says!
I didn't have the time earlier, but I wanted to thank everyone who
contributed to this very last review of the "SPF Classic" spec before it
becomes an RFC -- especially those who took the time to read for the first
time or re-read the entire document (you know who you are)!
Many brains can find more errors! Thanks!
Julian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEKvMDwL7PKlBZWjsRAvjLAJ0ZsXWKTV4+v8YMVg1JYnJUBBbSOgCdHdyS
IkTN2IQIFulXaPV+BEGAl/g=
=fatZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com