Scott Kitterman wrote:
http://new.openspf.org/FAQ
[...]
Please have a look.
Proclaiming the failure of Sender ID with a broken link is bad.
We have arguments, e.g. grab some technical details from the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_ID page. Or use its MARID
page, the same story from an IETF procedural POV. Or link to
these pages.
The financial side page appears twice. The "underscore" page
is bogus, simply kill it. DNS always supported all octets,
only fully qualified host names are restricted to "LDH" (as
explained in RfC 3696)
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com