spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] Re: AUTH48 [EN]: RFC 4408 <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

2006-04-10 05:33:01
"Scott" == Scott Kitterman
"Re: [spf-council] Re: AUTH48 [EN]: RFC 4408
   <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt> NOW AVAILABLE" 
 Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:20:00 -0400

    Scott> As changed in the ABNF, should the reference to RFC 3696
    Scott> now be normative vice informative?

    Scott> Scott K

    Scott> On 04/06/2006 20:03, Eric Nord wrote:
    >> Meng,
    >>
    >> This new diff includes updated pagination and table of
    >> contents.
    >>
    >> Please let me know if you have any further changes.
    >>
    >> _eric
    >>
    >> ================
    >>
    >> We have corrected the text as requested and posted the revised
    >> version of the document at:
    >>
    >> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc4408.txt

Oxymoron: Section 2.1 First paragraph, last sentence:

    ... many legitimate E-Mails are delivered with invalid HELO
    domains.

How can mails with invalid HELO domains be seen to be legitimate?

If mails with invalid HELO domains are legitimate, why bother looking
at HELO domains at all?

Proposed change: add the word "otherwise" thus:

    ... many otherwise legitimate E-Mails are delivered with invalid
    HELO domains.

        jam

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgpCaa8VA2fkQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature