-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
wayne wrote:
I'm a little surprised that Alfred's comments have received zero
feedback from the spf-discuss list.
I guess if I don't hear anything from anyone, I'll just try my best to
figure out which of these are erratas that are worth reporting to the
RFC editor and what the corrections should be.
I noticed and read your message and Alfred's comments.
I thought the RFC Editor doesn't make any corrections to RFCs once
published, EVER? (Yes, I know that errata are separate, but you said
"corrections", so I'm not sure which one you meant.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEbdsswL7PKlBZWjsRAqM3AKCgHRm9aizxGadAOUvA2XG32bL9YwCfcwnL
JCnB0zdC+C3zPKF7Y/mUsqs=
=VAyU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com