On Wed, 24 May 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I suggest removing the word gratuitously. That Sender ID is incompatible
with existing standards is a fact noted by the IESG in their note. The
degree to which that incompatibility is gratuitous is a judgment. Getting
+1
Done
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com