check_fqdn if he's being so picky, and no - its not a big deal, not enough
for errata, just something to keep in mind for future
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, wayne wrote:
I just received another email from Brian Wright. Among other things,
he pointed out that name "check_host()" in the spec is poorly named
because it is defined to check more than just host names, but rather,
any valid, fully qualified domain name. Maybe "check_domain()" or
"check_SPF()" or something would have been better.
Since the name is consistently used throughout the document and the
name is not used to define any normative meaning, I don't think this
is a big deal. If others think otherwise, please let me know.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com