spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: RFC 4408 erratas

2006-06-09 16:58:50

I just received another email from Brian Wright.  Among other things,
he pointed out that name "check_host()" in the spec is poorly named
because it is defined to check more than just host names, but rather,
any valid, fully qualified domain name.  Maybe "check_domain()" or
"check_SPF()" or something would have been better.

Since the name is consistently used throughout the document and the
name is not used to define any normative meaning, I don't think this
is a big deal.  If others think otherwise, please let me know.


-wayne

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>