On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
However as far as the SPF logo is concerned, to my knowledge it was never
discussed whether it should be free for use by everybody, so I guess the
council will have to set precedence on that. What do you think about it?
I did some research into this.
First off, Meng released the old website into the GFDL license. That
appears to include logos.
The closest I can find for statement about licensing or restrictions
was when Meng posted:
* * *
Logo available for slapping on your website
I rendered some logos at different sizes.
http://spf.pobox.com/protectedbyspf.html
See:
http://archives.listbox.com/736/200312/0003.html (SPF-announce)
http://archives.listbox.com/735/200312/0322.html (SPF-discuss)
I think it is a little late to be putting any restrictions on that
logo.
There was somewhat of a contest for a new logo earlier in Dec 2003,
but to the best of my knowledge, nothing really came of it.
See: http://archives.listbox.com/735/200312/0153.html
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com