spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective

2006-06-17 09:45:09
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:34:39 -0400 Mark Holm <mdholm(_at_)telerama(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstand, but I think I detect some incorrect logic in
this thread.

If Claire published a record with Neutral as the default (?all), how can
she say that the value lies "in the millions of other IP's that are
explicitly excluded from doing so"

If she published ?all, she is clearly not excluding other IP addresses.
She is indicating they should be treated as if they had no SPF record.
That is a very different statement.

She published v=spf1 ?a:someserver.example.com ~all.  No ?all.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [spf-discuss] Re: When receiving mail servers undermine the purpose of SPF - a domain owners perspective, Scott Kitterman <=