fyi;
A new accreditation service was announced yesterday. It appears to be
closely tied to DKIM. DKIM and DomainKeys have a feature that SPF
doesn't that is very important to some email senders: You can choose
on a email by email basis, whether to sign an email or not. So, you can
run all your outgoing email through a spam filter, and only sign those
that are very clean. This accreditation system extends this ability
to allow, on a email by email basis, whether accreditation should be
applied. So, an email sender can easily choose to only use
accreditation when sending email to receivers known not to complain to
the accreditation service about any problems.
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=147293
Also, I stubled upon this older article that talks about Meng's Karma
project and the Email Authentication Summit last April:
Bad karma surrounds e-mail authentication plans
http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/04/20/77623_HNemail_1.html
Also, ironport has announce they are going to start doing BATV. See:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;302955907;fp;2;fpid;1
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com