Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Does anyone think we should introduce a (however slight)
restriction nonetheless?
Are you talking abot that 16*16 icon with 110 colours plus a
32*32 variant with 228 colours, blue SPF with a red check
mark, transparent background ? I see it for the first time
today (after fixing a new ICO2XPM2 converter to handle more
than one image in an ICO) - I had it as "favicon.ico" in my
public directory with the SPF drafts for about a year.
I can remove it from this directory, if that's some new SPF
icon policy. Bye, Frank
This is getting increasingly confusing. Threads from other lists get
dumped here, without any insight into the history. It is annoying
having to figure out what the point of the thread is without seeing
the messages that came before. Now you get a few snippets from the
various authors that make no sense at all viewed in isolation :(
gr,
koen
--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, hosting, embedded systems, unix, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com