On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:50:27 -0400 Gino Cerullo
<gcerullo(_at_)pixelpointstudios(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 14-Aug-06, at 11:33 AM, spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:14:33 -0400 Gino Cerullo
<gcerullo(_at_)pixelpointstudios(_dot_)com> wrote:
This question came up on the Spamassassin Users mailing list and I
thought I would ask the experts here what they thought.
How are domains that publish records that cover the entire IP address
range dealt with.
Example,
"v=spf1 ip4:51.0.0.0/2 ip4:66.0.0.0/2 ip4:145.0.0.0/2 ip4:245.0.0.0/2
-all"
That's a proper SPF record. This is why SA doesn't give points to SPF
PASS.
Scott K
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was asking in a more general
way, not in relation to Spamassassin which I know does not score on
PASS.
No. Blacklisting the domain if they spam is exactly what you should do.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com