spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Which SPF implementation to choose? (fwd)

2006-08-25 12:53:36
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

should be removed from the list.  This is abuse in my book.  See previous
discussion of spf.

I received a private email from Ben.  He was sorry for the email.  He was
not aware of the problem with the sites anti-spam problem.  My problem was
I tried to email him after the bounce and received another C/R email
message.  So I posted to the list.  I hope he has not unsubscribed.  I
think this is an area that anti-spam providers need to fix.  I think he
could learn from the list and maybe get his provider to change/fix the
problem.

- --
Boyd Gerber <gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com>
ZENEZ   1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQFE71T9VtBjDid73eYRAsfvAJ42s4xN5qJbyU8vKbqXr+YwNq9mMwCaAq05
96NA0ykDwhejnO2U48IAVKY=
=eg5J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>