spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Which SPF implementation to choose? (fwd)

2006-08-25 12:32:39
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

should be removed from the list.  This is abuse in my book.  See previous
discussion of spf.

Thanks,

- --
Boyd Gerber <gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com>
ZENEZ   1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047

- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
From:  <ben(_at_)scheidvineyards(_dot_)com>
To:  <gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Which SPF implementation to choose?


Please read this entire message.  It is in response to an e-mail message you 
have sent to me.

You have recently sent an email to me at 
ben(_at_)scheidvineyards(_dot_)com(_dot_)

In order for me to receive your email message, you need to verify your e-mail 
address.  (This is part of our Spam Filter system).  To verify your e-mail 
address, please click the link below.  It will allow your message and all 
future emails to be immediately delivered from your email address 
(gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com)to mine.  Thanks!

Please click here to verify:
http://svin.com/ve(_dot_)php?t=gerberb(_at_)zenez(_dot_)com,215580,227887

For a detailed explanation of this system, please click the following link: 
http://www.scheidvineyards.com/spam/

Please do not reply to this message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQFE71AVVtBjDid73eYRAjZCAJ9yyFTmAOjvPlnY5mi5dY50GdXBpQCeP7x/
yi6HCmPxY++rJzKX+ZNV2wE=
=OBEO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>