spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Which SPF implementation to choose?

2006-08-22 09:11:54
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:02:32 +0000 Julian Mehnle <julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> 
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ulrike vom Stein wrote:
I am using IIS. There are several windows based solutions which use SPF.
What I am interested is to know which solution is based on which SPF
library. Wouldnt that be a good information on the openspf website?

As far as I know, none of the Windows/IIS/Exchange solutions are based on 
libspf or libspf2, they all use proprietary SPF implementations (which 
needn't be a bad thing).

The "SPF Event Sink"[1] by Johan Strand is probably the most open one, but 
it is no longer under active development and is listed as "Alpha" quality 
software on SourceForge.

The other Windows/IIS/Exchange solutions, "Policy Patrol Spam Filter",
"MailEssentials", "Sunbelt Messaging Ninja", are all commercial products.  
Depending on your other mail filtering needs, it may be worth buying one 
of them.

References:
1. http://sourceforge.net/projects/spf-event-sink/


The pySPF library works fine on Windows, but you'd have to figure out how 
to integrate it yourselves.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com