On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
* rename include: to something like if-pass. It is *really* badly
named right now and causes a lot of confusion.
Why not just name it "if:" (less confusing) and provide "include:" as a
deprecated (confusing but backwards compatible) alternative?
Because "if-fail:" would also be quite useful.
For more evidence that "include:" is misnamed, I found this in my logs:
config.com text "v=spf1 include:216.28.158.0/24 include:67.15.56.0/24
include:67.15.57.0/24 include:www.2.sitegalore.com include:66.219.135.0/24" "
-all"
They are probably thinking spfv3 needs "exclude:" :-)
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com