On Tuesday 24 October 2006 09:21, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
What _spf convention?
There are 34 "_spf" in 32 lines of RFC 4408. Of course "_foo" should
also work in these cases - SPF doesn't depend on the proposed registry
of underscore conventions. But maybe DKIM and SSP would need it (?)
OK, but iirc those are just examples nothing normative there. DK/DKIM and
perhaps SSP do need it.
BTW, I am actively seeking inputs for my TXT provider list:
http://www.kitterman.com/spf/txt.html
I'd like to know which providers support the "_" trick.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com