SPF Discuss (date)
October 31, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 22:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 22:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 22:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 22:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 21:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 21:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 21:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 21:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Devin Ganger, 21:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 20:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Jeff Macdonald, 20:28
- [spf-discuss] draft-otis-spf-dos-exploit (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 18:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], william(at)elan.net, 16:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 14:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] sid-milter questions, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits, Julian Mehnle, 12:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 10:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 10:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)) backbone.schlitt.net GREYLIST_ISWHITE autolearn=ham version=3.0.4, Scott Kitterman, 10:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Scott Kitterman, 10:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), wayne, 10:33
- [spf-discuss] What should be the result of exceeding optional process limits?, wayne, 10:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 10:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 10:22
- [spf-discuss] Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)), Julian Mehnle, 10:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 10:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 09:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 09:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] sid-milter questions, Scott Kitterman, 09:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] sid-milter questions, wayne, 09:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Stuart D. Gathman, 08:59
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: BITS November 9 Email Security Meeting, Julian Mehnle, 08:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] sid-milter questions, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:08
- [spf-discuss] sid-milter questions, Ramprasad, 07:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 00:54
October 30, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], wayne, 23:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], william(at)elan.net, 19:12
- [spf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67)], Frank Ellermann, 19:03
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 17:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 14:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Jeff Macdonald, 11:31
October 25, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Scott Kitterman, 12:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Adrian De los Santos, 11:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Adrian De los Santos, 09:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Adrian De los Santos, 09:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Scott Kitterman, 08:24
- [spf-discuss] SPF/postfix iowait > 90%, Adrian De los Santos, 08:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Frank Ellermann, 01:18
October 24, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Scott Kitterman, 20:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Frank Ellermann, 15:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] "_" Support - was: Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Scott Kitterman, 07:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Frank Ellermann, 07:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, wayne, 06:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Scott Kitterman, 06:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Frank Ellermann, 06:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Scott Kitterman, 06:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Revision available: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf-02, Frank Ellermann, 06:04
October 23, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Frank Ellermann, 23:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF records have more than doubled in the last year, Frank Ellermann, 22:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 21:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 21:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF records have more than doubled in the last year, wayne, 20:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Julian Mehnle, 18:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Julian Mehnle, 17:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, wayne, 17:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 16:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:40
- [spf-discuss] SPF records have more than doubled in the last year, wayne, 16:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, william(at)elan.net, 14:36
- [spf-discuss] MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman, 14:09
October 21, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: un.{org,int}. TXT "v=spf1 ...", Frank Ellermann, 17:17
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 10:37
- [spf-discuss] un.{org,int}. TXT "v=spf1 ...", Julian Mehnle, 10:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 10:24
October 19, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 15:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Larry Smith, 14:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Patrick Oonk, 14:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 13:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Mike, 11:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 11:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Larry Smith, 11:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Michael Breton, 11:16
- [spf-discuss] Cities with SPF-equipped domains?, Julian Mehnle, 06:47
October 16, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Graham Murray, 22:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF not strictly "opt-in", Stuart D. Gathman, 20:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF not strictly "opt-in", wayne, 18:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Stuart D. Gathman, 11:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF not strictly "opt-in", Terry Fielder, 09:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF not strictly "opt-in", Dick St.Peters, 09:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF not strictly "opt-in", wayne, 09:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Stuart D. Gathman, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Dick St.Peters, 08:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Frank Ellermann, 04:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF not strictly "opt-in", Julian Mehnle, 03:57
October 07, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Julian Mehnle, 13:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Scott Kitterman, 09:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Frank Ellermann, 09:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Julian Mehnle, 03:02
October 06, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Terry Fielder, 20:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408, Frank Ellermann, 18:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408 (was: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding), Terry Fielder, 17:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408 (was: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding), Scott Kitterman, 17:08
- [spf-discuss] Compiling a list of errata for RFC 4408 (was: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding), Julian Mehnle, 16:34
October 03, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, John Hinton, 10:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Daniel Wiberg, 10:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Scott Kitterman, 10:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, william(at)elan.net, 09:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, wayne, 09:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Ramprasad, 08:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Daniel Wiberg, 05:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Scott Kitterman, 05:31
- [spf-discuss] should SPF checks be before or after RBL, Ramprasad, 05:25
October 01, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Frank Ellermann, 13:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Julian Mehnle, 07:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: #spf, Frank Ellermann, 06:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, Frank Ellermann, 06:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: #spf, Julian Mehnle, 05:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: #spf, Frank Ellermann, 05:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Error in RFC4408: URL encoding, wayne, 05:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: #spf, wayne, 05:13