-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
William Leibzon wrote:
Yes, I noticed. Provide list of appropriate rebutal points and I'll make
it after the presentation.
Also Doug recently brought this up on nanog (mail list), so something
needs to be posted there too (I was planning to last week but never got
around to posting). As much as I hate to actually bother responding to
typical Doug anti-SPF behavior [and he's mostly along contuinuing to
bring it up], I think it might be easier to just have mail list post
(or wiki page) to point people to from other forums where he mentions
it.
I started a new page on the website with an analysis of draft-otis-spf-dos-
exploit:
http://new.openspf.org/draft-otis-spf-dos-exploit_Analysis
As written at the top of that page, I have also started editing draft-otis-
spf-dos-exploit to remove most of the polemics, irrelevant details, and
the (likewise irrelevant) advertising of DougO's "alternative name-based
approach" (draft-otis-smtp-name-path). As of now, I've cleaned up the doc
up to and including section 3. I'll do the rest tomorrow.
Comments and additions to the analysis are welcome.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFR/xEwL7PKlBZWjsRAuuNAJ90op8p9IKBkZQMHbtgJe1GaXke0wCg/6YI
m2Rzy+f1L8N0tw3CvFYQxP8=
=eJS+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com