spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise

2006-10-31 21:36:00
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:18, Devin Ganger wrote:

Can you be more precise? Are you saying that MS implementations (such as
Exchange) do PRA checks on v=spf1 records instead of MAIL FROM checks, or
are you saying that they do PRA checks on v=spf1 records for Hotmail/MSN?

It's both.

I'm giving a session on Sender ID and SPF next week at Exchange Connections
in Las Vegas, and if the Exchange Sender ID implementation is broken in
this fashion, I'd like to let people know.

That would be good.

If anyone wants to look over the PowerPoint slides for the previous version
of this session (I gave it last April), it's at:

http://www.3sharp.com/files/deving/exc02.ppt

I would VERY much appreciate any comments, clarifications, and advice. I've
already marked away some time this weekend to update the presentation with
the talking points from the SPF vs. Sender ID page.

When do you need comments by?

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>