On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:38:36AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
So, not only do they abuse existing SPF records in an inappropriate,
incompatible way (by applying SPF records to RFC822 "From:")
I brought this topic up at the recent MAAWG meeting in Toronto. I
basically said to Craig Spiezle 'stop telling people to publish v1
records for SenderID'.
I also asked Harry Katz if MS has ever done MFROM evaluation. He
responded 'never'.
I'll keep pressing the issue at every conference/meeting I'm at.
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com