spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Processing limits (was: DNSOP Agenda for San Diego (IETF 67))

2006-10-31 14:00:15
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:39:23PM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:

The RFC itself is mute about how to react, so you can do whatever you want 
and still be compliant.

Which is exactly why I was fighting in similar cases to get a clear,
explicit, limit.  Unfortunately this one passed without me noticing.

IIRC a similar discussion occured when talking about processing limits.
These kind of limits cannot be fuzzy, Julian just pointed out why not.

Alex

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>