On Oct 25, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:49:34AM -0500, Adrian De los Santos wrote:
spf_policy unix - n n - 50 spawn
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/perl /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd-policy.pl
If you have other options, try them. Perl processes can be bad.
No, i was looking for another way to implement SPF in postfix and
this is the only one i found, even in the postfix documentation,
postfix does not use libspf and only allows spf to be specified as a
external process daemon.
4.- Add all my DNS servers in my resolv.conf including my own caching
DNS (i have 2 additional dns Servers)
nameserver 192.168.200.1
nameserver 192.168.200.2
nameserver 192.168.200.246
Wouldn't this actually reduce the chance of retrieving a cached
record?
mmm... yea maybe, i will make some adjustments and debugging of the
perl spf process to see how and where it queries and how much time it
spends..
Anyway, please make sure to get other people's input as well. I
certainly do not claim to have presented -the- solution.
Alex
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-
discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
==================================
Adrian de los Santos
demon(_at_)demon(_dot_)com(_dot_)mx
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s: a C++++ UL+++++ UC++++ US+++ UX++++ UB+++ P++++ L+++++++++
E--- W+++ N++ U++ K w-- O- M++ V PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv++ b++ DI+
+ D++ G++ e+++ h+ r++ z+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK---
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com